|
Post by avordvet on Mar 15, 2011 9:47:00 GMT -5
Why Liberals Want Gun Shows Stoppedby Mike Piccionem 03/15/2011 "Here is the controversial aspect of a gun show: the unlicensed seller. This is a person that wants to sell his personal property to another individual. It is the equivalent of you saying “Mike, you want to sell that .22?” And then me telling you I’ll take 50-bucks for it. We have a deal and I’m the unlicensed seller. But, I don’t need a license to sell you my .22. That is the “gun show loophole.” Read Article: www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=42287
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2011 9:56:46 GMT -5
It's another example of the Over Reach of the damned Feds. The STATES already have the ability to limit or regulate in state commerce. Feds are only legally allowed to oversee INTERSTATE commerce.
It's another attempt by the Feds to eliminate the authority of the independent states. The Fed is a construct of the States, we hold authority over them. Not the other way around.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Mar 15, 2011 10:41:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Michael Downing on Mar 15, 2011 11:21:56 GMT -5
I believe liberal progressives and their so called moderate allies want to control every aspect of your life and if they can not control it then they want to stop it and eliminate it. The commerce claus or Santa Claus they will use whatever they ahve to gain and maintain control. Just another reason to limit firearms because with them you are potentially uncontrollable and without them one way or another you can be brought under control if necessary. For some it is the power and money that comes with control. For others, the idealogues, it may be the belief that the public in general is too stupid to properly control their lives without be rigidly over see. therefore you can and should be told what to eat, where you can go, what you can do and what you should believe....
Again guns can get in the way of that so they must find one way or another to first limit and then do away with firearms. The problem for them is that they have not yet realized that there are more people than they would care to realize that will take no more of it. there are many who are willing to draw that final line in the sand. They can not and will not be allowed to abridge my 2nd amendment rights.
|
|
|
Post by hefferman1 on Mar 15, 2011 16:27:02 GMT -5
“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.” Patrick Henry
I will not give up the GOD given Inalienable right to own and use a firearm. End of Story!!!!
If the ability to defend the Republic is gone, then the Republic is gone. If the Republic is gone, we are no longer free men, but slaves.
Again I quote Patrick Henry "Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God!"
I will not be a slave, because it is better to die stand on my feet, than living on my knees.
|
|
|
Post by jimbravo on Mar 15, 2011 21:09:45 GMT -5
Amen, to that.
|
|