|
Post by brocktownsend on Aug 24, 2010 0:13:14 GMT -5
"When it comes to privacy and accountability, people always demand the former for themselves and the latter for everyone else."-- David Brin ======== Dead Letter - Our Constitution Of No Authority "......it is foolish to believe that present or future inhabitants of the U.S. will continue to accept the legal restraints and distributed sovereignty that mattered to 18th century Northern European Protestant merchants and small landowners."www.namsouth.com/viewtopic.php?t=4059www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/untimely-observations/dead-letter/
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Aug 24, 2010 5:10:19 GMT -5
Yeah, as soon as I start seeing words like "neocon" and fresh attacks on the only news network that is getting the word out, it made it very difficult to take this writing very seriously.
I like the way these jerk-offs constantly attack Fox and other conservative outlets... but never mention MSNBC, CNN, and all the other alphabet "News" corporations that are actually doing critical damage to the country and our Constitution.
Then he felt the need to stick his finger in the eye of one of the main national groups taking the fight back to D.C... not a great way to make friends and allies.
"Tea Party partisans to give the appearance of being 18th-century colonists protesting English tyranny. All of this is inexpressibly ridiculous for more than one reason."
I haven't see his whinny butt standing up at any of the national protests... but he is more that willing to sit behind his computer and bitch and whine about the pace.
|
|
|
Post by NCFREEDOM on Aug 24, 2010 7:24:00 GMT -5
I read his completely unintellegable article and by the end I could not discern whether he beleived in the title of his article or to the contrary. His views, or lack there of, may have more context witht he article he was trying to comment on. "Alternate Right", WTF is that? I scanned his whole website trying to gain some sense of who, what the site stands for. Can anyone else tell? Is he a Ron Paul supporter? A libertarian, a statist, what is he? All I can tell is he is establishing his brand on conservatism, huh? As you know I am neither a republican or a "neocon", I am a conservative libertarian, more in line with Jeffersonian ideals, so where does that place me profeesor as one of oyur enemies? I can't tell where he is on the political spectrum because the blog is so convoluted. I read some of his other blogs, and they are just as convoluted without any true substance. Anyway I took his comments as a critism of the constituitonalist movement so I posted this responce,
"Thank you for giving me insight into who the constitutionalist's enemies are.......
"Although we’re holding an exceedingly poor hand and the momentum is mostly on the other side, we should use those resources that are available to us to keep our enemies from gaining more ground."
Thought we were all American's, I guess those with constituitonalist views are enemies of the state now. That's right the DHS already labeled us as terrorists (potential). So much for acceptance of differing political thought. The more this type of demonization occurs the closer you push "your enemies" to defending the remnants of the republic from our now self described enemeies.
Where you point out that a midwesterned retiree has nothing in common with a 18th century Bostonian is void of any deep thought on the similairities. Culture different, absolutely, spiritually and yearning for freedom similar, absolutely.
In the abscence of our Bill of Rights, your statist friends would have already fully enslaved the American people, of course you already know this, and all the more why as a constitutionalist I am your enemy.
|
|