John Roberts... The Dem/leftist supporting Trojan Horse within SCOTUS and a traitor to the Republic.
SAF Reacts as Supreme Court Turns Down 10 Second Amendment Cases
June 15, 2020 By Dave Workman
The Supreme Court stunned gun owners by declining to review any of the 10 cases pending before it.
In a blistering reaction to the U.S. Supreme Court’s rejection of ten gun rights cases for review, the Second Amendment Foundation declared Chief Justice John Roberts “owes every gun owner in the United States an explanation about why the high court declined to hear a number of important Second Amendment cases.”
John Roberts May Not Be the Ally Gun-Rights Advocates Hoped For The Court’s decision not to hear several Second Amendment cases may be a sign that the chief justice is not a solid vote against gun control.
Adam Winkler, June 16, 2020
Easily overlooked in all the attention paid (rightly) to the historic Supreme Court decision extending antidiscrimination protections to LGBTQ people was a quiet announcement by the justices that they would not hear any of the 10 Second Amendment cases they had been considering. By agreeing not to decide these cases, the justices sent a clear signal to the gun-rights movement: Stop looking to the Supreme Court to strike down gun-control laws.
SCOTUS Rejection of 2A Cases Moves Up Likelihood of a Forced Choice for Gun Owners
Ammoland Inc. Posted on June 18, 2020 by David Codrea
By ignoring their oaths and usurping legislative powers, the Roberts court, with a few notable exceptions like Clarence Thomas, is guaranteeing gun owners will be forced to choose between obeying disarmament edicts or resisting them, with all that implies. (Fred Schilling, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States)
U.S.A. – -(Ammoland.com)- “Opponents of gun safety laws have again failed in their efforts to get the Supreme Court to adopt their extreme and dangerous approach,” Eric Tirschwell, managing director for Everytown Law crowed Monday, following the high court's refusal to consider any of the 10 gun owner rights appeals petitioning to be heard. “In each of the cases, the lower courts correctly determined the Second Amendment is not a barrier to the reasonable, life-saving gun safety policies being challenged. The Supreme Court recognized there is no need to revisit these thorough rulings.”
They were pretty moderate cases, really, some challenging “special needs justifications” used to turn “may issue” into “don’t hold your breath,” bans on “commonly owned” standard capacity magazines and firearms, a challenge to interstate prohibitions on handguns sales, a challenge to a ban on handguns that do not employ microstamping and a challenge to the denial of rights to non-residents.
SCOTUS: Chickens Out on the Second Amendment Inaction by the Supreme Court permits states to continue to run roughshod over gun rights.
By: Leesa K. Donner, June 16, 2020
As time goes by, it is becoming all too clear that the U.S. Supreme Court would rather side-step state and local violations of the Second Amendment than sort out the increasingly thorny issues that are being caused by overreaching state legislatures. Out of almost a dozen opportunities set before them, the justices denied hearing a single case that involves the right to bear arms. Associate Justice Clarence Thomas is none too happy about this and issued a dissent regarding the Court’s refusal to make decisions in several crucial gun rights cases. One is left to conclude that the topic of the Second Amendment is just too hot to handle in these most uncommon times.
By refusing to consider these legal questions, the High Court sends a message to the states that they will not be held to account for infringing on the Second Amendment rights of their citizenry and ultimately bestows tacit approval on a number of gun rights violations. In essence, this lack of action on the part of the High Court provides for the disproportionate application of the right to bear arms.
Sneaky congress? No, more like traitorous congress...
Sneaky Congress Hides Red Flag in National Defense Authorization Act
Ammoland Inc. Posted on July 26, 2020 by John Crump
WASHINGTON, D.C. –-(Ammoland.com)-Congress is hiding a red flag law in the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for the Fiscal Year 2021 (H.R. 6395).
The NDAA authorizes the military to “red flag” anyone subject to the Uniform Code of Military Conduct. According to the NDAA, a friend or relative could report the service member as “abusive.” An ex parte “court” will hear the claims of the friend or relative and decided whether to take firearms away from the accused. The gun owner doesn’t have a chance to defend themselves or even know that someone is accusing them of abuse.
In the civilian world, law enforcement and the courts refer to red flag laws as Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPO). The NDAA refers to these red flag laws as Military Court Gun Confiscation Orders (GCOs). Even though the names of the rules are different, both laws work primarily the same way. Like ERPOs, GCOs lack due process. The court would assume the military member is guilty of abuse until they could prove their innocence as a later date. According to gun rights advocates, the same service members that swear an oath to the Constitution will lose their Constitutionally guaranteed rights under the new NDAA. Military police or SWAT teams would carry out a raid of the gun owner’s house in the middle of the night to strip them of their gun rights.
The service member would then have to prove their innocence to get their firearms back from the same government that they are protecting.
iprazhm: I live in Fl and Rubio used to be the Florida Speaker of the House. As Speaker, he refused to allow bills on the floor for a vote, that hindered illegal aliens. On CNN, he said that he's willing to take the right to own a gun from Florida citizens. Traitor
May 16, 2019 18:55:29 GMT -5
iprazhm: “I absolutely believe that in this country if you are 18 years of age, you should not be able to buy a rifle, and I will support a law that takes that right away,” U.S Senator Marco Rubio Fl qz.com/1213296/parkland-florida-shooting-fou
May 16, 2019 18:56:09 GMT -5
avordvet: If a citizen is old enough to carry a rifle in the military service, then they are old enough to buy/own a weapon and exercise their god-given natural right to self-defense.
May 21, 2019 4:37:28 GMT -5
iprazhm: I have come to believe that God placed Trump in office to help Israel, and nothing else. He is clearly not there to secure the republic or promote decency. Only when the people return to serving Christ, will our country return to being great again.
Jun 1, 2019 18:15:16 GMT -5
avordvet: Welcome thomas
Aug 12, 2019 14:49:27 GMT -5
avordvet: Welcome cloudbound1
Aug 16, 2019 4:01:08 GMT -5
walfred: Threat level-HIGH....Level of Readiness-MAXIMUM
Oct 7, 2019 1:54:10 GMT -5
iprazhm: Invaluable information.
Mar 23, 2020 14:40:22 GMT -5
avordvet: Welcome phatday3
May 19, 2020 4:12:22 GMT -5