|
Post by avordvet on Mar 22, 2015 5:22:06 GMT -5
Good, looks like the NRA is full in...
and they're also starting to clean house... may be hope for 'em and a Second Amendment restoration yet.
|
|
|
Post by Michael Downing on Mar 22, 2015 7:16:56 GMT -5
blog.cheaperthandirt.com/atf-move-5-56-m855-ammo-ban-time/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=social&utm_content=chronicle0321&utm_campaign=20150321-atfclaimsmorestudyonm855ammobanATF Claims “More Study” on M855 Ammo Ban Buried in between stories on ATF raids, the bureau Tweeted yesterday afternoon its intentions for “more study” on the purposed armor-piercing ammo exemption—M855 ammo ban—before making a final decision. Thanks to the efforts of gun owners such as you, the ATF has already received a record number of comments—over 80,000—before the comment period has ended. The people have spoken and it seems the ATF heard our voices. ATF Tweet saying they will not make a final decision on the ammo ban at this time The ATF Tweeted its intentions for “more study” on the purposed ammo ban. “Notice to those Commenting on the Armor Piercing Ammunition Exemption Framework Thank you for your interest in ATF’s proposed framework for determining whether certain projectiles are “primarily intended for sporting purposes” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(17)(C). The informal comment period will close on Monday, March 16, 2015. ATF has already received more than 80,000 comments, which will be made publicly available as soon as practicable. Although ATF endeavored to create a proposal that reflected a good faith interpretation of the law and balanced the interests of law enforcement, industry, and sportsmen, the vast majority of the comments received to date are critical of the framework, and include issues that deserve further study. Accordingly, ATF will not at this time seek to issue a final framework. After the close of the comment period, ATF will process the comments received, further evaluate the issues raised therein, and provide additional open and transparent process (for example, through additional proposals and opportunities for comment) before proceeding with any framework.”
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on May 14, 2015 3:04:20 GMT -5
Dems Have A Bunch of New Ideas to Stop You From Buying AmmunitionMay. 13, 2015 9:04am Pete Kasperowicz Thirty-one House Democrats have proposed legislation that would prevent people from buying ammunition online, and would instead require all purchases to be made in person — a change they admit is aimed at preventing people from buying “unlimited” ammunition over the Internet. The Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act, from freshman Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.), would also require all ammo dealers to be licensed by the government, and require bulk ammo purchases to be reported to the government. www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/05/13/dems-have-a-bunch-of-new-ideas-to-stop-you-from-buying-ammunition/
|
|
|
Post by southwind on May 14, 2015 7:51:21 GMT -5
Definition of "bulk"?
|
|
|
Post by Michael Downing on May 14, 2015 10:17:54 GMT -5
Bulk per dictionary.com
goods or cargo not in packages or boxes, usually transported in large volume, as grain, coal, or petroleum.
Never have I ever ordered ammo by full rail car or even a complete truck load though the idea is intriguing.
Bulk per Big gov anti gunners
Anything greater than a box of 20 or 50 depending upon caliber.
Stop on line sales. Make all purchases face to face through dealers. Show identification for proof of age. Then add background checks and then add permits to purchase. makes perfect sense to me.
|
|