|
Post by avordvet on Dec 11, 2013 14:23:38 GMT -5
Would Americans Actually Dare Revolt Against This Abusive Government?By Donald Joy, 9 December 2013 I realize that by typing these words and sending them out over the cyber-clothesline, I’m somewhat risking a visit from the gestapo. So what. Let them throw me in jail. My wife and son would suffer, but if I’ve learned anything about that woman in the eight years we’ve been married, it’s that she can catch fish just as well or even better than I can on any given day, and probably live off the land if she has to. She was pretty much raised that way.
Have we as a society become so soft and accustomed to the comforts of technology and of various government checks & subsidies that too few of us would ever forcefully resist the tyranny that is growing from the power-mad panderers of the Left?clashdaily.com/2013/12/americans-actually-dare-revolt-abusive-government/
|
|
|
Post by watchful on Dec 11, 2013 19:41:44 GMT -5
Truth is a always relevant to your opinion.
When our government passed the Patriot Act we didn't revolt. When then President George Bush( king George the elder) signed a treaty with the UN to authorize UN soldiers to enter and restore order in case the Federal Government failed, we did not revolt. When then President Bush (King George the lesser) issued the Homeland security presidential Directive 5 giving the President of the united States to declare martial law when ever he felt it was necessary we did not revolt. When then President Clinton passed the technologies for multiple re-entry warhead technology to the Chinese by taking such a rocket to China for launching, and allowing them to scrap it after it blew up on the launcher in China, we did not revolt. When Barrack Obama bowed to the king of Saudi Arabia and apologized for our past help to the region we did not revolt.
When our seated congress passed the 2010 NDAA allowing the president to authorize our military to kill Americans on america soil we did not revolt.
With this record I am confused about exactly what we would call being abusive?
|
|
|
Post by hefferman1 on Dec 12, 2013 14:26:43 GMT -5
Truth is a always relevant to your opinion. When our government passed the Patriot Act we didn't revolt. When then President George Bush( king George the elder) signed a treaty with the UN to authorize UN soldiers to enter and restore order in case the Federal Government failed, we did not revolt. When then President Bush (King George the lesser) issued the Homeland security presidential Directive 5 giving the President of the united States to declare martial law when ever he felt it was necessary we did not revolt. When then President Clinton passed the technologies for multiple re-entry warhead technology to the Chinese by taking such a rocket to China for launching, and allowing them to scrap it after it blew up on the launcher in China, we did not revolt. When Barrack Obama bowed to the king of Saudi Arabia and apologized for our past help to the region we did not revolt. When our seated congress passed the 2010 NDAA allowing the president to authorize our military to kill Americans on america soil we did not revolt. With this record I am confused about exactly what we would call being abusive? I wonder if King George the III felt the same way about the Stamp Act, or his limiting of free trade, or his new Tea Tax? If they keep pushing they will find the line in the sand someone will not just let them cross over. Like then someone will stand up and things will go down hill from there. We may have troops in cities before we stand up, that is one of the things that started the first American Revolution.
|
|
|
Post by watchful on Dec 13, 2013 8:41:55 GMT -5
Truth is a always relevant to your opinion.
We all have to become extra observant, of not the federal government, but our local governments. The current politicos have read their history and realize that if the british had used bribes instead of Red Coats we would all still be Subjects of Her Royal Majesty and her bankers and talk9ng very funny.
Here in our counties and towns today we have local politicians serving to be selected, not by us, but by the Parties for advancement to there next level. These folks do their time as Magistrates, Councilmen, and women, and Mayors. Then they progress to the State house or Governors mansion. Then they are ready to become Federal Legislators. Then maybe to that big house on Pennsylvania avenue.
The route is diverse, but filled with opportunities to help the pickers above them with a plug here or a special bill, or regulation there, that will ingrate them to the upper legions. The fact these local and state laws and programs violate their oaths makes them more valuable since they have proven they will comply, and toe the line.
Here in town is where we need to make them aware that they serve at OUR WILL and not theirs, or the parties. I have in the past shunned the voting box as I see it as a sacrificial act of giving my vote to a corrupt party administration. However! I am going to be in that box with pen in hand from here on out writing in the names of those who will serve our wishes locally, and not selecting the appointed ones who serve to progress. I encourage you all to join me.
When we can get enough people to do this so that the party corruption is readily evident then, and only then, will the people begin to raise up in anger. In my capacity as a county organiser for the North Carolina Common Law Grand Juries I will also speak of this reclamation of our voting box as well as our Jury box. Both require we educate the people to the problems. Both are far more beneficial than our AMMO BOX.
Make no mistake!
The people are awakening. They are just waiting till they can see what it all means TO THEM. Then they will step up and start applying hand cuffs to the oath breakers and tyrants who claim to serve them, but really serve the Tyrants.
|
|