|
Post by avordvet on Jun 25, 2013 3:46:03 GMT -5
United States: Democracy or Judicial OligarchyThe ruling in the same sex marriage issue before the Supreme Court will indicate whether the United States is still a democracy or has become a judicial oligarchy. In a democracy, elected officials decide major social issues like how government will treat the ancient mating practice of marriage. In a oligarchy, non elected officials dictate policy to elected officials based on their personal views. www2.ljworld.com/weblogs/science-becoming-religion/2013/jun/24/united-states-democracy-or-judicial-olig/
|
|
|
Post by watchful on Jun 25, 2013 7:18:28 GMT -5
There have been no judicial decisions since 1933 when we went from law to commerce. If every family is based upon a moral religious tenet then how can immoral unlawful lifestyles be accepted. If a family is teaching their kids how to be morally accountable the schools have problems teaching the commercially correct way of living that makes money for both the Government, but the pharmaceutical industry.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Jul 1, 2013 4:31:48 GMT -5
Rein in the Imperial JudiciaryJuly 1, 2013, By Richard Winchester Lately it's almost always the Left's agenda being imposed by judicial fiat. What the left cannot win at the ballot box, they have gotten via federal court rulings. The Constitution stipulates how the imperial judiciary can be reined in, and there is constitutional precedent for this procedure (Ex parte McCardle, 74 U.S. 506 [1869]). www.americanthinker.com/2013/07/rein_in_the_imperial_judiciary.html
|
|
|
Post by watchful on Jul 1, 2013 7:47:04 GMT -5
I try and read each and ever one of those decisions. I read both the claim and the response. In most cases I have had to agree with the Justices. The Supreme court does not try the actual cases. They simply review the points of law claimed by the bar-Fly British nobles of the Esquire cast and the claims that they submit.
We the people because we have little or no idea what the Constitution actually says except as explained by these esquires in their lawyer speak versions.
So when the SCOTUS response is published, even with the addition of the Pro and Con explanations by individual justices, we again depend up[on the Talking heads for the Media to decipher it so our demented minds can grasp the explained results in NEWSPEAK.
Everyone of us needs to pass up "Big Brother's " newest sex kitten and read what is written. I have found that in most cases what the Bar-Fly Esquires have submitted has little or nothing what so ever to do with what the Talking heads are claiming.
Ignorance may be bliss, but it is not safety.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Jul 1, 2013 13:12:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by watchful on Jul 1, 2013 19:08:59 GMT -5
Ok! Let us look at what this means to you and I.
To be a lawyer in the 50 states requires that you be a member of the State Bar Association.
The State Bar association is a corporation in that state and is not a Government State or Federal organization. However in most of the 50 states the State Bar association is responsible for allowing, or disallowing, a person to be a lawyer and practice Law before the State Supreme Court.
The Constitution for the united States forbids any member of the Government to hold any Foreign offices or to receive any foreign emoluments or Titles. Yet the American Bar Association has millions of members, many of which serve in Congress and the Justice Department of the Federal Government. The title for a member of the Bar association is "Esquire". The title "Esquire" is one step below a "Squire" in English heraldry. This is a Foreign title.
The word "BAR" is a monogram for an office located at 106 Downing Street in Old London. The office is the British Archival Registry.
In the days before our independence a person read the law under a working Lawyer or Judge of the court. When he was determined to be qualified he opened an office and began helping people.
Today a person goes to an accredited College that has a Law degree program and when he graduates he joins the State Bar and soon is on his or her way.
Each and every one of these "esquires" are a violation of the Constitution. It is just a continuation of what George Carlyn called the CLUB. The one you ain't a member of and never will be.
This was the purpose of the loss of the original 13th Amendment. To keep these Foreign agents in power.
|
|