|
Post by Cujo on Jun 15, 2013 11:02:26 GMT -5
Tom Francois was harassed for criticizing President Obama because he has a large Twitter following! Tom Francois was visited by the Secret Service merely because he posted anti-Obama messages for his “large” Twitter following to read. I am sick and tired of looking out the window to see if Old Glory is still flying to reaffirm my shaky belief that I still reside in America. Francois never threatened the president; he simply lambasts and lampoons his actions, facial expressions, and unconstitutional policies. The most thin-skinned president in the history of the Republic has proven once again that he has nothing but disdain for the First Amendment. The Secret Service agents arrived at the home of Tom Francois and asked if they could come inside and take a look around. www.offthegridnews.com/2013/06/13/breaking-secret-service-invades-home-of-obama-critic-over-twitter-followers/The age old question is, should he have allowed them in without a search warrant? Like if he consented they would be more respectful? Asking Tom to sign a release form for his health and mental records, I'd say F$#K ya, they had/have an intent. If you don't trust Marxist then why make it easy for them, your health/mental records will be interpreted as "they" please! Just because you do not roll over to comply with the harassment does not mean you should be disrespectful though, I hate to say it but remain respectful (yes you can say F$#K ya in a respectful manner but firm with your Constitutional rights and B.O.R. my .02
|
|
|
Post by Michael Downing on Jun 15, 2013 11:34:22 GMT -5
If you don't trust Marxist then why make it easy for them, your health/mental records will be interpreted as "they" please! This Is How the Government Will Destroy the 2nd Amendment ncrenegade.com/editorial/this-is-how-the-government-will-destroy-the-2nd-amendment/The Obama administration has set a goal to restrict firearms guaranteed under the 2nd amendment. Their first attempt has failed but their second attempt will focus on mental illness. Once a diagnosis of mental illness is made, the right to bear arms will be restricted or more likely, eliminated for the individual. A good example was a seminar in Raleigh, NC in May, 2013 where a panel of dubious distinction explained how mental illness evaluations should be a requirement for firearm registration. Doctors are now asking patients if they own a firearm as part of their examinations. Imagine trying to justify firearm ownership by people who are considered mentally ill (by the government). Which is why this will be the focus for disarming the people.
|
|
|
Post by hefferman1 on Jun 15, 2013 15:31:15 GMT -5
God Almighty People, think!!!
Never allow any search without a warrant, and never talk to cops.
Get a lawyer, and never say anything.
|
|
|
Post by Cujo on Jun 15, 2013 17:30:52 GMT -5
Except for, I plead the 5TH.
|
|