|
Post by southwind on Apr 13, 2014 19:45:04 GMT -5
One of the most intelligent comments from a poster at Western Rifle Shooters:
"I read that there was much surveillance-drone activity … high-level photographic + comms interception.
Clearly, those drones could rain down unpleasantness, too. In any realistic scenario, they have to be neutralised.
There must be a long list of key personnel, without whom the Feds cannot impose their will. That list would contain drone operators … LEOs … SWAT teams … bureaucrats … ranking officers …and so forth.
From a psy-ops standpoint, it might make good sense to publish widely, the names, addresses, photos of the key players, so that patriots in their locality can make their own decisions as to how to react to State’ violence.
I have seen bits-and-bobs of pertinent information, dribbled out on FB. The data would need to be much more comprehensive.
I reckon that, if I was on that list, I would be very uncomfortable with the fact that any number of local people might have designs upon my safety. By making things “personal”, you strip away the psychological protection that is afforded to them, by their being part of the “biggest gang on the block”."
http://westernrifleshooters.wordpres...anch/#comments
|
|
|
Post by southwind on Apr 13, 2014 19:47:49 GMT -5
This from a NV resident on my other board...
"On a related note, people who I trust are telling me the purpose of the BLM backing off is to give other agencies time to work their magic on the militias. Infiltrate, put pressure on the families, employers, etc. All of the usual dirty tricks. Identify the members and make them think twice about their support. Round 1 is over, round 2 will be even more interesting."
I'm jus sayin, what is good for the goose is good for the gander.
|
|