|
Post by walfred on Aug 7, 2013 16:47:19 GMT -5
If a preplanned low yield Nuke was detonated by Isr. in Hom,Syria,8/1/13.it would explain the sudden and complete shut-down of U.S.Embassies across the Mid-East. www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzlzbDn51tkNOTE: if the yield is low and the detonation is below ground(Subway tube/Deep bunker) the characteristic bright flash of light(X-Ray bust) would not be seen ground level. 1955's low yield nuke test; www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9ahoAMAGL8
|
|
|
Post by brocktownsend on Aug 7, 2013 18:31:28 GMT -5
It was not reported as such at the time. The nuclear slant started yesterday I believe. There has been a gigantic explosion at an ammunition store in Homs, Syria, after opposition fighters fired rockets into the regime-held area of the city. www.youtube.com/watch?v=vefpIcUdqHM<modified link>
|
|
|
Post by hefferman1 on Aug 7, 2013 21:39:35 GMT -5
The X-ray burst would still be there. There is a seismic signature that shows a nuclear explosion, even a air burst explosion. There would be one explosion, not some small ones, and then four bigger secondary explosions. Go watch it on video. Any one saying that was a nuke needs to pull their heads out of their rear most orifice and get a breath of fresh air. Just because someone says it on the internet doesn't mean it is true. www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_CgPsGY5Mw
|
|
|
Post by walfred on Aug 8, 2013 16:29:40 GMT -5
The new low yield devices have a much smaller impulse(shock) wave,so the seismic signature would be very different.The device was detonation underground,most likely a subway tube or possibly a sewer system(notice the second cloud where the tube/tunnel reaches the surface),as in the second video from the 50's.So now flash of light. If you've seen Japanese footage there were many secondaries/fires following the blast. Keep it,respectful!We are on the brink of WWIII/Civil war/revolt.Your comment is not productive and MSM commercial links serve no useful purpose. mid-east news in the area calls the attack nuclear and say it's not the first. www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/08/08/317725/armageddon-watch-over-syria/My point is we need to look more closely at this and what is happen here.We can't jump to conclusions or miss a single thing.
|
|
|
Post by brocktownsend on Aug 8, 2013 17:43:14 GMT -5
We can agree to disagree then. I was on Long Binh when the ammo dump went up during Tet '68. I was screwing off, but one of my buddies was blown out of the back of a deuce and a half. Check out the first pictures. www.namsouth.com/viewtopic.php?p=21#21
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Aug 8, 2013 17:59:08 GMT -5
Jack wads wouldn't know a nuke if it bit 'em in the butt, it all conventional stuff being used... that said, some of the conventional weapons these days can get close... The GBU-43/B being just one of them.
|
|
|
Post by hefferman1 on Aug 9, 2013 12:19:54 GMT -5
The new low yield devices have a much smaller impulse(shock) wave,so the seismic signature would be very different.The device was detonation underground,most likely a subway tube or possibly a sewer system(notice the second cloud where the tube/tunnel reaches the surface),as in the second video from the 50's.So now flash of light. If you've seen Japanese footage there were many secondaries/fires following the blast. Keep it,respectful!We are on the brink of WWIII/Civil war/revolt.Your comment is not productive and MSM commercial links serve no useful purpose. mid-east news in the area calls the attack nuclear and say it's not the first. www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/08/08/317725/armageddon-watch-over-syria/My point is we need to look more closely at this and what is happen here.We can't jump to conclusions or miss a single thing. First it doesn't matter if it is the world's smallest nuke or the biggest, it has the same seismic signature. It is based on the burst and how that signature wave moves through the rock in the Earth's crust. This signature is what showed the N. Koreans failed on their first nuclear test, and only had a partial detonation on their second attempt. If it can pick up a failed test, it can pick up a small nuke. P.S. there has to be so much nuclear material to cause a reaction, that means a small nuke still blows up a good size area. This was a none nuclear explosion, anything else is pure fantasy. It was a conventional explosion with secondary conventional explosions.
|
|
|
Post by walfred on Aug 10, 2013 0:04:31 GMT -5
I disagree!....
|
|