|
Post by hefferman1 on Dec 25, 2012 15:01:51 GMT -5
It looks like more has come out about Feinstein's Bill. She wants to include all Semi-Auto, no GrandFather Clause, because of bump fire stocks. www.examiner.com/article/feinstein-s-assault-weapon-ban-would-be-tantamount-to-confiscationAll weapons would be treated the same as a Full Auto weapon today. This is an "Intolerable Act" type of Bill and must be beaten down, or refused to obey. The Right to Bear Arms is a God Given Inalienable Right, and can not be taken, or given away. I WILL NOT COMPLY, I WILL NOT OBEY, I WILL FIGHT THIS, EVEN TO THE POINT OF ARMED RESPONSE!!!!
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 25, 2012 15:13:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Michael Downing on Dec 25, 2012 18:08:10 GMT -5
I like that flag. My son has one on the wall in his room.
|
|
Sine Pari
Full Member
Titan18series3DBn/75th
Posts: 82
|
Post by Sine Pari on Dec 26, 2012 10:00:04 GMT -5
A friend of mine said by spring there will be no more semi Auto firearms at all for civilian use. He work's for the BATF.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 26, 2012 10:24:33 GMT -5
A friend of mine said by spring there will be no more semi Auto firearms at all for civilian use. He work's for the BATF. BATFE is one of the most oppressive anti- second amendment Bill of Rights offices in the federal govt.
|
|
|
Post by Cujo on Dec 26, 2012 10:59:49 GMT -5
Hey Bitch, I'm sorry excuse me, Senator Bitch how does it feel to want.
|
|
|
Post by brocktownsend on Dec 26, 2012 12:00:10 GMT -5
A friend of mine said by spring there will be no more semi Auto firearms at all for civilian use. He work's for the BATF. $100 bucks says he's wrong. Ask him to take the bet. If yes, tell him to give you the money and I'll give my bucks to Michael.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 26, 2012 12:12:55 GMT -5
$100 bucks says he's wrong. Ask him to take the bet. If yes, tell him to give you the money and I'll give my bucks to Michael. Although I don't see it happening, in this day and time I wouldn't make that bet, with a die hard marxist at the helm, who knows what they might try.
|
|
|
Post by m21308 on Dec 26, 2012 12:20:08 GMT -5
Well, "try" is a mighty big word for only having three letters. No worries here.
|
|
|
Post by hefferman1 on Dec 26, 2012 15:30:28 GMT -5
A friend of mine said by spring there will be no more semi Auto firearms at all for civilian use. He work's for the BATF. They can outlaw them all they want. They will still be out here, but they may be more used by then.
|
|
|
Post by hefferman1 on Dec 26, 2012 15:31:15 GMT -5
I have that on my pickup truck.
|
|
|
Post by Michael Downing on Dec 26, 2012 20:20:58 GMT -5
The gun grabbing idiots have set off a panic buy that should have realized that would happen. Back log in less than one week at one NC gun manufacturer went from 200 rifles when the owner took a few days off for Christmas to over 2000 rifles when he returned to work today. from jbigham... www.opencarry.org/?p=674New York police begin planning for confiscation CBS News reports that the NYPD is actively considering how they will go about confiscating guns from law-abiding citizens should the anti-gunners succeed in passing a semi-auto ban. Given the massive civil rights abuses committed by the NYPD in the past, one can only imagine how many citizens will be assaulted, falsely arrested, or even killed should such an event take place.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 27, 2012 4:21:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Michael Downing on Dec 27, 2012 9:50:09 GMT -5
There were reports during katrina of "officers" (some mercenaries) that were going neighborhood to neighborhood to confiscate weapons. They met armed resistance in some neighborhoods who had taken it upon themselves to provide their own protection. They abandoned their attempts in those areas and went onto areas who would simply comply. Do not comply. RESIST....
|
|
|
Post by hefferman1 on Dec 27, 2012 15:49:04 GMT -5
Here is that evil things actual Bill. www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/assault-weaponsBans the sale, transfer, importation, or manufacturing of: 120 specifically-named firearms Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one military characteristic Semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds Bans large-capacity ammunition feeding devices capable of accepting more than 10 rounds. Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms Act, to include: Background check of owner and any transferee; Type and serial number of the firearm; Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint; Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate State or local law; and Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration I will not comply, I will resist with force.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 28, 2012 5:44:10 GMT -5
Poll: Most back tighter gun laws but oppose assault weapons banBy Meghashyam Mali - 12/27/12 08:18 AM ET A new poll shows the public generally in favor of stricter gun laws in the wake of the Newtown, Conn., mass shooting, but opposing many specific measures, including a ban on assault weapons. Fifty-eight percent say they back tightening gun control, up from 43 percent in October of 2011, according to a new poll from USA Today released Wednesday night. thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/274613-poll-most-back-tighter-gun-laws-but-oppose-assault-weapons-ban
|
|
|
Post by brocktownsend on Dec 28, 2012 13:55:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 28, 2012 14:25:45 GMT -5
Gallup: Opposition to handgun ban hits all-time high The Left's anti-2A agenda is folding in on itself, everyone see's it for what it is; a blatant disarmament attempt. Expect some desperation moves soon.
|
|
|
Post by hefferman1 on Dec 28, 2012 18:40:25 GMT -5
Gallup: Opposition to handgun ban hits all-time high The Left's anti-2A agenda is folding in on itself, everyone see's it for what it is; a blatant disarmament attempt. Expect some desperation moves soon. They don't care what the people want. The communist have their agenda, and they will push it, till they are stopped at the end of a gun. Remember they believe all political power flows out of the barrel of a gun. Mao When they do what they want, no matter what the people say, we show them, they are correct. Power does flow out of the barrel of guns, along with projectiles. Tyrants only understand force, so we need to speak a language they understand.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Jan 1, 2013 8:57:00 GMT -5
The Fallacy of Gun ControlBy Edward Paltzik, January 1, 2013 There is nothing "lazy" about characterizing the inalienable right to defend self, family, and property, and the right to hunt, as "natural rights." Preaching from their ivory towers (typically capitol buildings, college campuses, gated communities, and urban apartments), gun control proponents casually dismiss the dire consequences of disarming law-abiding citizens. www.americanthinker.com/2013/01/the_fallacy_of_gun_control.html
|
|
|
Post by safetalker on Jan 1, 2013 10:20:47 GMT -5
These articles all are base upon some overt action that will activate a force of manpower to enter into our properties and physically confiscate the weapons we own. That is at this time physically and financially impossible. They need only do as they have done in other countries. They will apply to our greed and need to have us trade our weapons for things we either desire more or need more. This is a proven plan and is working fine as we write this. In the past six months they have gone to the source and purchased ammo we can't get, and had it moved to storage centers for use when the ratio of us to them is better. Then they don't need a law to prevent the sale of guns. They can simply have the Customs and Border Protection agents stop inspecting imports. When a Conex is placed on a hold in a port the owner is still required to pay storage fees until it is released. When the owner has a number of these on hold they are going broke. They must either declare the Conex abandoned and the Feds confiscate them or apply to have them shipped home. The company I buy knives from has a number of Conex's full of throwing knives and small Cross bows under this hold. Then they host these buy backs with NO QUESTION ASKED. They will pay for weapons that are stolen, bought from street dealers, and peoples weapons. This allows the thugs on the street to sell your weapons for money without any recordation or return to owners allowed. Then since they gain access to your medical records under Obama care they look for those of us with POSSIBLE PTSD and have them committed to an evaluation and their Doctor signs that you are a risk and they use the Courts to take all weapons you may have and prevent you buying anymore, or the can simply put you in a backward shirt on the 6th Floor under meds. Finally when the food runs out they will trade guns for food packs. This is much cheaper, much safer for their agents, and very effective. What man can watch his family starve so he can keep his weapons? This is why I keep stressing that we need to Cache' our battle rifles and ammo so no one knows if it is available even if they search. The old comment I always get is They can have my gun when they pry it from my cold dead fingers is at best teenage exuberance.. It is not a plan for the future.
|
|
|
Post by hefferman1 on Jan 2, 2013 1:04:21 GMT -5
These articles all are base upon some overt action that will activate a force of manpower to enter into our properties and physically confiscate the weapons we own. That is at this time physically and financially impossible.They need only do as they have done in other countries. They will apply to our greed and need to have us trade our weapons for things we either desire more or need more. This is a proven plan and is working fine as we write this. In the past six months they have gone to the source and purchased ammo we can't get, and had it moved to storage centers for use when the ratio of us to them is better. Then they don't need a law to prevent the sale of guns. They can simply have the Customs and Border Protection agents stop inspecting imports. When a Conex is placed on a hold in a port the owner is still required to pay storage fees until it is released. When the owner has a number of these on hold they are going broke. They must either declare the Conex abandoned and the Feds confiscate them or apply to have them shipped home. The company I buy knives from has a number of Conex's full of throwing knives and small Cross bows under this hold. Then they host these buy backs with NO QUESTION ASKED. They will pay for weapons that are stolen, bought from street dealers, and peoples weapons. This allows the thugs on the street to sell your weapons for money without any recordation or return to owners allowed. Then since they gain access to your medical records under Obama care they look for those of us with POSSIBLE PTSD and have them committed to an evaluation and their Doctor signs that you are a risk and they use the Courts to take all weapons you may have and prevent you buying anymore, or the can simply put you in a backward shirt on the 6th Floor under meds. Finally when the food runs out they will trade guns for food packs. This is much cheaper, much safer for their agents, and very effective. What man can watch his family starve so he can keep his weapons? This is why I keep stressing that we need to Cache' our battle rifles and ammo so no one knows if it is available even if they search. The old comment I always get is They can have my gun when they pry it from my cold dead fingers is at best teenage exuberance.. It is not a plan for the future. If you think so, then why even come here and discuss things. Call it teenage exuberance, if you want. Just as Samuel Adams, and others would not comply in 1775, neither will I today. I will not comply, I will resist.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Jan 2, 2013 13:38:37 GMT -5
Big, bad story.I have always been an avid reader of mysteries--from a very young age, I have been a devotée of Christie, Sayers, James, Rendell, Doyle and others. More than mere popcorn pulp, which invites the reader merely to chew (usually with his/her mouth open), a good mystery invites the reader to think along with the detective. In a well-written murder mystery, once the weapon is found, the action is driven by the character of the suspects and, often, that of the detectives. Unearthing a motive or, at least, a reason for the murder becomes the driver of the plot. The weapon may be a major clue, but it is not the solitary focal point. Motive, character, conflict and gradual psychological unraveling are. In other words, just as in the real real world, the story hinges on the people in it, not their modes of execution. Otherwise, the story would not be credible or even interesting. To compare a murder event such as Sandy Hook with fiction may appear superficial. dorettawildes.wordpress.com/2012/12/31/big-bad-story/
|
|
|
Post by Cujo on Jan 2, 2013 16:57:50 GMT -5
Agreed
|
|
|
Post by Cujo on Jan 2, 2013 17:45:25 GMT -5
What Would Happen if the Government Banned Firearms and Tried to Confiscate Our Guns? A rifle behind very blade of grass. And blending into every tree. As in, “What if…the government banned all semi-automatic weapons and ordered them be turned in or confiscated from US citizens who would not do so voluntarily?” We all quickly agreed a violent revolution and rebellion would occur almost immediately. Most, if not all, members of Congress who voted for the ban/confiscation would be assassinated. In fact, what Bob Owens describes in this post “What You’ll See At the Revolution” is exactly what we described would happen. Tens of millions of Americans will refuse to comply with an order that is clearly a violation of the explicit intent of the Second Amendment. Among the most ardent opposing these measures will be military veterans, active duty servicemen, and local law enforcement officers. Many of these individuals will refuse to carry out what they view as Constitutionally illegal orders. Perhaps 40-50 million citizens will view such a law as treason. Perhaps ten percent of those, 4-5 million, would support a rebellion in some way, and maybe 40,000-100,000 Americans will form small independently-functioning active resistance cells, or become lone-wolves. They will be leaderless, stateless, difficult to track, and considering the number of military veterans that would likely be among their number, extremely skilled at sabotage, assassination, and ambush. www.infowars.com/what-would-happen-if-the-government-banned-firearms-and-tried-to-confiscate-our-guns/Personally I think the articles numbers are low, " maybe 40,000-100,000 Americans will form small independently-functioning active resistance cells, or become lone-wolves."
|
|
|
Post by safetalker on Jan 2, 2013 18:20:57 GMT -5
Heffferman I come to these pages for information to help me and my neighbors. I just want to make sure that we are all wide eyed and awake and I present my opinions because they come very hard. I can not take a smooth quote from a Beck, or a Limbaugh, or some other radio for hire and call it truth. I post so all will see one more point of view. If I can save a single life or a single patriot from jail by pointing out a different way to skin the same cat I am well satisfied. What I put forward was what I had learned from reading about 100 articles from the web both in the states and in europe. I stood my ground with rifle in hand and watched as others near me were moved back to the aid station never to be seen again. Some lived and went home, others just went home. I carry every day, but pray every morning that I not need my weapon. I plan for as many possibilities as I am able. I have a BOB but will never use it. I am too old to run, to slow to hide, and too ornery to give up so when they come I will be here with a smile on my face knowing my family will be safe elsewhere. If I offend with alternatives I apologize, but will "Endeavour to persevere".
|
|
|
Post by hefferman1 on Jan 3, 2013 0:25:59 GMT -5
Heffferman I come to these pages for information to help me and my neighbors. I just want to make sure that we are all wide eyed and awake and I present my opinions because they come very hard. I can not take a smooth quote from a Beck, or a Limbaugh, or some other radio for hire and call it truth. I post so all will see one more point of view. If I can save a single life or a single patriot from jail by pointing out a different way to skin the same cat I am well satisfied. What I put forward was what I had learned from reading about 100 articles from the web both in the states and in europe. I stood my ground with rifle in hand and watched as others near me were moved back to the aid station never to be seen again. Some lived and went home, others just went home. I carry every day, but pray every morning that I not need my weapon. I plan for as many possibilities as I am able. I have a BOB but will never use it. I am too old to run, to slow to hide, and too ornery to give up so when they come I will be here with a smile on my face knowing my family will be safe elsewhere. If I offend with alternatives I apologize, but will "Endeavour to persevere". In other words you just said the same teenage exuberance, you poked fun at in others. Different opinions are good. Trying to act like someone else saying they will stand, and putting the leftist propaganda view that we will fold doesn't look so good. All I have to say is, it is getting close to put up, or shut up time, so get ready. It is going to be a bumpy ride, hang on tight.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Jan 4, 2013 5:42:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by hefferman1 on Jan 4, 2013 12:05:32 GMT -5
You beat me to it. I was going to post the same thing.
|
|
|
Post by hefferman1 on Jan 4, 2013 12:07:25 GMT -5
|
|