|
Post by hefferman1 on Oct 18, 2012 11:04:44 GMT -5
It is another story from Freedom Camp 7. randomthoughtsandguns.blogspot.com/2012/10/fc7-irregular-electronic-warfare-radars.htmlThis sounds like great info. A few tents, a few radio signals, a homemade radar dummy, and you can draw in air assets. If they see so many of these, it would also make it hard to figure out which ones, are real. Think of a pilots reaction, and thought process if the second he takes off, someone switches one of these on. After dropping flares, and chaff, kicking in after burner and wasting fuel, he will return to base to change his flight suit to one without a big brown streak in the back. It would also mean a ground force would be sent to check things out. I suggest a vehicle to power a converter and a microwave oven. That would sound like good bait.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Oct 18, 2012 13:05:58 GMT -5
EW definitely has to be factored in the 4GW matrix.
I did some time in electronic warfare back in the day, we (the military) could locate and jam pretty much any signal... Today, we ALL can.
From various inexpensive spectrum analyzers to Radar Jammers, RF Jammers, to Cell Jammers, although separate packages and a more limited range, they still work the same.
A few vehicles with various Power Port run Jamming devices could cause a helluva mess when used in an urban environment.
|
|
|
Post by hefferman1 on Oct 18, 2012 18:03:19 GMT -5
Most fixed wing aircraft land by computer now days. If you could jam the signals from the beacons, and send false signals, you could cause a real problem for the aircraft.
Changing the altitude by 50' lower could cause major airframe damage. Grounding several aircraft for a while. If you crack the airframe, the aircraft could be down for good.
Throw GPS signals off and the electronic aimed fire from artillery, and indirect fire could be way off and ineffective.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Oct 19, 2012 3:12:22 GMT -5
|
|