|
Post by brocktownsend on May 6, 2009 14:20:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by jerome on May 6, 2009 23:49:59 GMT -5
Only question i have is what was the "threat" that caused that letter to be written? I know the .gov has overstepped the boundry of the law on numerous occasions. Waco, Ruby Ridge, the raid they pulled to take that cuban kid a few years back so they could send him to his commie father....Only difference between those times and the time we live in now is that people are sick and tired of .gov doing as they please with no regard to the Constitution or the majority of the publics opinion. Pull something like that now and the Rodney King riots will look like a peaceful walk in the park, IMO
|
|
|
Post by brocktownsend on May 7, 2009 11:46:37 GMT -5
Only question i have is what was the "threat" that caused that letter to be written? I know the .gov has overstepped the boundry of the law on numerous occasions. Waco, Ruby Ridge, the raid they pulled to take that cuban kid a few years back so they could send him to his commie father....Only difference between those times and the time we live in now is that people are sick and tired of .gov doing as they please with no regard to the Constitution or the majority of the publics opinion. Pull something like that now and the Rodney King riots will look like a peaceful walk in the park, IMO Jerome: This explains the rationale. Anonymous said... Was this letter actually mailed to Eric Holder? Anonymous, Yes it was mailed. But if my nose for bureaucratic excrement is giving the right signals, he already has a copy on his desk. On another blog, I just posted this in response to an argument between fans and skeptics: The letter is what it is, boys. An explication of the obvious on the occasion of the receipt of multiple threats against someone who has taken on the ATF and made their tyranny more difficult. Explaining to someone ahead of time the consequences of their actions is not a threat. It also, you may notice, often makes the action less likely. THAT is what the letter is about. It also is an extension of something we did back in the 90s with declared militia mutual defense packs and intolerance for more government misbehavior. It is another diplomatic note in the continued cold war between liberty and tyranny in this country. Holder will understand this letter, whether you do or not." -- Mike Vanderboegh III
|
|
|
Post by hefferman1 on Jun 24, 2009 1:38:05 GMT -5
Here is my response to that blog.
Mike is right. From up here in Kentucky, I could never get to Alabama in time to be much help. I could get to a city near here to deliver a message that certain behavior is not socially acceptable in America, at least by III%er standards. No, free Wacos, Ruby Ridges, no free gun grabs like New Orleans. That is my line in the sand, and I will not back down, or back off again.
|
|
|
Post by brocktownsend on Jun 24, 2009 10:21:08 GMT -5
Here is my response to that blog. Mike is right. From up here in Kentucky, I could never get to Alabama in time to be much help. I could get to a city near here to deliver a message that certain behavior is not socially acceptable in America, at least by III%er standards. No, free Wacos, Ruby Ridges, no free gun grabs like New Orleans. That is my line in the sand, and I will not back down, or back off again. Great!
|
|