|
Post by avordvet on Jun 4, 2019 16:04:07 GMT -5
Trump: Passing Gun Control that obama never could get away with, and as usual, it's crickets chirping from the republican groupies...
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Jun 6, 2019 5:34:56 GMT -5
Huh, how about that; Trump mentions every DemocRat anti-Second Amendment tag line (Guns are for hunting and sport), but not once does Trump actually defend the Second Amendments restriction on government interference in a citizens RIGHT to self-defense...
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Jun 19, 2019 4:56:49 GMT -5
Stop using the Lib term "Silencer", as there is nothing "Silent" about a Suppressor, which only knocks about 30db off the weapons report. There are a handful of almost "Silent" weapons and most of those were military.
Still, I wouldn't mind dropping a suppressor on the ol Ruger MKII... I got to fire this back in the day, and it was about as quiet as you can get...
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Jun 20, 2019 4:44:32 GMT -5
7 Reasons Suppressor Ban May Cause Pro-Gun Voters to Abandon TrumpAWR HAWKINS, 19 Jun 2019 Voters are still outraged over President Trump’s post-Virginia Beach intimation that he is open to considering a suppressor ban. On June 5, Breitbart News reported Trump telling Good Morning Britain‘s Piers Morgan that he would “seriously look at” a suppressor ban. Trump’s comments came in a conversation where Morgan referred to the accessories as “silencers,” giving the impression that the accessories completely eliminate the sound of a gun shot. In reality, suppressors make the sound of a gun shot manageable, removing the ear-splitting high pitches associated with one. But they do not mute the shot. Here are seven reasons why action against suppressors is politically risky: www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/06/19/7-reasons-suppressor-ban-may-cause-pro-gun-voters-abandon-trump/
|
|