|
Post by avordvet on Nov 24, 2015 4:55:18 GMT -5
Lib media all in for Gun Control just like their O'messiah decrees... Doesn't matter what the truth is, but what they can get away with.
And this is the reason the media will keep the push going as long as they can...
The next gun grabbing round is on the way... all slathered in 'wanna-be' patriotism and Liberal "common sense".
|
|
|
Post by Michael Downing on Nov 25, 2015 19:47:20 GMT -5
www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/11/18/democratic-rep-says-paris-terrorist-attacks-should-motivate-stricter-laws-in-america-but-not-about-dealing-with-terrorism/Democratic Rep. Says Paris Terrorist Attacks Should Motivate Stricter Laws in America — but Not About Dealing With TerrorismIllinois Democratic Rep. Jan Schakowsky told SiriusXM radio this week that the Paris terrorist attacks should motivate stricter gun laws in the United States. The congresswoman said that “before we killed a jihadist named Awlaki, he did a video that said to Americans, ‘join the jihad and get guns, because it’s so easy in the United States of America to get a weapon.’” “And that ought to be a chilling reminder because — aside from blowing themselves up, which is, of course, not about small weapons — these people used the kinds of weapons that are still available in the United States of America,” Schakowsky added. “And I think it ought cause us to have another consideration of sensible gun safety laws.” www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/11/17/obama-hopes-gun-control-will-be-dominant-issue-in-year-eight-of-his-presidency/Obama Hopes Gun Control Will Be Dominant Issue in Year Eight of His PresidencyPresident Barack Obama said in a recent interview that he hoped gun control will be a major issue in the 2016 election and regrets that he was unable “to capture this moment” of the Sandy Hook shooting to pass more restrictive laws. GQ published an interview with Obama Tuesday conducted by Bill Simmons, co-creator of ESPN’s “30 for 30″ sports documentary series and author of “The Book of Basketball” who currently creating his own show for HBO. Simmons referred to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton stumping on gun control and said during the interview, “It does feel like it’s going to become the dominant issue of year eight.” “I hope so,” the president responded. “We have this weird habit in this culture of mourning and, you know, 48, 72 hours of wall-to-wall coverage, and then…suddenly we move on. And I will do everything I can to make sure that there’s a sustained attention paid to this thing.” And they aren't alone... www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/11/24/chris-christie-bulls-s-about-past-support-for-gun-control.htmlChris Christie Bulls---s About Past Support for Gun ControlAsked whether he got into politics to preserve New Jersey’s assault-weapons ban—a rough stance in today’s GOP presidential primary—the governor denied it, then said he didn’t remember. Chris Christie has been having a difficult time with his memory this week. On Sunday evening, when he was asked about Donald Trump’s claim that New Jersey Muslims took to the streets of Jersey City on Sept. 11, 2001, to celebrate the terrorist attacks, the New Jersey governor replied that he didn’t “recall that” happening, but he also didn’t seem to recall that law enforcement had long ago debunked the rumor. Now Christie is having trouble remembering the details of why he decided to run for office for the first time, in 1993, when he sought out a state Senate seat. On Fox News on Tuesday night, Christie was asked about guns. Specifically, host Bret Baier—a Rumson, N.J., native!—wanted to know, was it really true that the issue that inspired him to get involved in politics was gun control? “No, that’s not true,” Christie said, shaking his head and giving a nervous-sounding laugh. “No.” “Well, in 1993 you said you were motivated to run for office by supporting—preserving—New Jersey’s assault weapons ban,” Baier replied. A look of panic spread across Christie’s face. “Yeah, I don’t remember saying that. So, you know, we’ll see,” he said. Just then, a quote appeared on the screen—one Christie gave to the Star-Ledger in April 1993—that would seem to contradict his answer. “The issue which has motivated me to get into this race is the recent attempt by certain Republican legislators to repeal New Jersey’s ban on assault weapons,” Christie said at the time.
|
|
|
Post by Michael Downing on Nov 27, 2015 7:33:59 GMT -5
www.gunsamerica.com/blog/dems-urge-obama-to-close-loophole-via-executive-action/Dems Urge Obama to Close ‘Loophole’ via Executive ActionDemocrats in Washington D.C. are asking President Obama to use executive action to close the so-called “gun-show loophole.” Ninety-six representatives and 24 senators signed separate letters with the same message addressed to the president urging him to “investigate and pursue all available options under your executive authority to reduce gun violence,” reads the senate letter. The purported loophole allows the private sale of firearms without a background check by those not “engaged in the business” with only licensed gun dealers required by law to perform the checks. Specifically, the Democrats want the administration to provide clearer and broader language about who must administer background checks when selling a firearm. “Updating the definition of ‘engaged in the business’ to provide more explicit guidance as to which gun sellers are required to obtain a federal firearms license would not impact a father giving a gun to his son, or an individual selling his gun on the internet,” the Senate letter reads. “But it will help ensure that individuals are not able to continue to exploit ambiguity in the current regulation and sell guns at a high volume without any oversight by ATF and without conducting background checks.” The effort, led by Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut and Rep. Mike Thompson of California, echoes Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton’s pledge to use executive authority to close the loophole.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 2, 2015 5:55:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 3, 2015 14:57:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 4, 2015 5:24:11 GMT -5
CF boils it down to the essence....
Oh they want to grab at 'em, and they want to go after 'em soooooooo badly that they are almost frothing at the mouth...
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 4, 2015 13:39:14 GMT -5
And this poll is in San Diego, Ca... Might still be an active poll
Well looks like the people have spoken... that won't slow the anti-freedom forces though.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 7, 2015 5:07:44 GMT -5
President Obama Explains Why Taking Away Americans' Guns Will Make Them All Safer - Live FeedSubmitted by Tyler Durden on 12/06/2015 19:55 -0500 The best gun salesman in America is about to explain how he - and his administration alone - will 'fix' the new un-normal rash of mass shootings, terrorist-attacks, murders, and general civil disorder by continuing down the path of stricter, tighter, confiscation-er gun control laws. As we previewed earlier President Obama wasted no time to launch this impromptu address to the nation at 8:00 pm on the "threat of terrorism and keeping the American people safe." Administration staff confirmed that the president will specifically call on Congress to review certain gun control measures. Translation: another surge in gun sales is imminent as fears of gun confiscation rise to unprecedented heights. So, what will Obama say? www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-12-06/president-obama-explains-why-taking-away-americans-guns-will-make-them-all-safer-liv
|
|
|
Post by Michael Downing on Dec 7, 2015 11:03:37 GMT -5
ncrenegade.com/editorial/ag-lynch-we-have-concerns-about-people-who-have-large-stockpiles-of-weapons/AG Lynch: ‘We Have Concerns’ About People ‘Who Have Large Stockpiles of Weapons’“Dealing with guns is one way to handle the violent crime issues that we have in this country,” Attorney General Loretta Lynch told NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday. She also said “people come on the FBI’s radar screen for a variety of reasons,” and the accumulation of guns and bullets may be one of those reasons: “You know, obviously we have concerns whenever we see people who have large stockpiles of weapons or appear to be in the process of accumulating weapons and ammunition. At this point, we do not have any evidence that they (Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik) were part of either a larger group or cell or that they were planning anything else. That’s at this time. “What I will say is, again, we are continuing to run everything to ground we can about these two individuals.”
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 7, 2015 13:04:07 GMT -5
Lynch, along with rest of the oath breaking turds, can go screw themselves...
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 8, 2015 4:54:56 GMT -5
Obama now wants guns from these 47,000 peopleNot even Marines, air marshals, congressmen, journalists and babies safe from schemePublished: 7 Dec 2015, Chelsea Schilling If the federal government doesn’t want the 47,000 people on its No-Fly List to board airplanes, those individuals should be banned from ever owning guns, President Obama argued in his Sunday address from the Oval Office – but if his proposal ever becomes law, America could see U.S. Marines, congressmen, journalists and even federal air marshals mistakenly stripped of their firearms. “To begin with, Congress should act to make sure no one on a No-Fly List is able to buy a gun,” Obama said Dec. 6. “What could possibly be the argument for allowing a terrorist suspect to but a semi-automatic weapon? This is a matter of national security.” But while San Bernardino, California, terrorist Syed Rizwan Farook managed to fly to Pakistan and Saudi Arabia under the radar of federal authorities in 2014, thousands of innocent people have been mistakenly linked to U.S. terror watchlists. Some experts and critics contend the federal list process contains many errors and relies on an overly broad standard of reasonable suspicion. www.wnd.com/2015/12/obama-now-wants-guns-from-these-47000-people/
|
|
|
Post by Michael Downing on Dec 8, 2015 7:40:20 GMT -5
The no fly list itself is unconstitutional. People without due process who just might be a potential threat are not allowed to fly and face it from the sheer size of this country to travel from one place to another the only practical way to get there is to fly. To extend that to not allowing these people to the constitutional right to keep and bear arms is treasonous. If these people are guilty of a crime then bring them to justice and through proper due process convict them. If they do not have evidence to do so then so it goes.
I do remember that Teddy Kennedy was on the list at one time and even that was counter productive. Hopefully that did not force him to drive as we know that was a problem for him from time to time.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 8, 2015 14:35:48 GMT -5
And so it begins. Governor Cuomo feels froggy, SAFE Act enforcement thugs rounding up "assault weapons." Someone is going to get shot and the civil war will commence. SSI, Tuesday, December 8, 2015 Just exactly where and how the NYSP got hold of 4473s is an interesting question. They either got them from ATF industry operations inspectors or directly from cooperating quisling gun sellers. In any case, it is obvious that the Supreme Court refusal to hear the Chicago case is viewed as a green light to tyrannical gun raids. Isn't this where His Majesty's General Gage started? And how did THAT turn out? We are about to find out if this generation of Americans possesses the same Three Percent that the Founding generation did. Get ready folks. Make your final pre-war preparations with the slender hours you have left. A storm is coming, and it is about to break over all our heads. sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2015/12/and-so-it-begins-governor-cuomo-feels.html
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 10, 2015 14:15:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by smith1955 on Dec 10, 2015 14:20:12 GMT -5
Here we go www.courant.com/politics/hc-no-fly-list-connecticut-20151210-story.htmlRTFORD – Gov. Dannel P. Malloy announced Thursday that he is seeking to deny gun permits to anyone on federal government "watch lists,'' making Connecticut the first state to try to block firearms sales to individuals who are prohibited from flying. A spokesman said that Malloy's office planned to issue an executive order and was working directly with the White House to gain access to the lists, which include people who are suspected of having connections to terrorist groups. President Obama has called for banning gun sales to those on the federal "no-fly" list. "If Congress will not act, we in the states will,'' Malloy told a press conference outside his office Thursday afternoon. He said this was "simple common sense." Should people on the no-fly list be able to buy guns? Yes. Should people on the no-fly list be able to buy guns? Yes. He said he would deny gun purchases to those "who represent a real risk, as opposed to a made-up one or perceived one."
|
|
|
Post by Michael Downing on Dec 10, 2015 18:49:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Michael Downing on Dec 10, 2015 23:15:22 GMT -5
ncrenegade.com/editorial/presidential-executive-action-expanding-background-checks-on-gun-buyers-is-imminent/Presidential “Executive Action” expanding background checks on gun-buyers is imminentBreitbart News previously reported that Obama was focused on finding ways around Congress to expand background checks, and CBS News reported that Obama had a team of White House lawyers looking at the possibility of setting an arbitrary limit of allowable gun sales so that private sellers who surpass that limit would be required to run sales through a background check. Without indicating which avenue Obama plans on taking, the AP reports that White House Advisor Valerie Jarrett indicates Obama is ready to circumvent Congress. She said he has asked “his team to complete a proposal and submit it for his review ‘in short order.’” This executive push for expanded background checks comes just over a week after expanded background checks in California failed to stop Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik’s San Bernardino attack. And the San Benardino attack came less than a week after Colorado’s expanded background checks failed to stop Robert Lewis Dear from killing two civilians and one police officer near a Colorado Springs Planned Parenthood.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 12, 2015 5:01:39 GMT -5
The Liberal Theology Of Gun ControlWZ, December 11, 2015 5:01 pm If you are of evil, you really don’t want to stop it.Via WSJ: How does a man who entered the White House vowing to restore science to its proper place tell us that gun control is the answer to terrorism? After all, California already has strict gun control, as does France, which just had its second terrorist massacre this year. Not to mention that the one time when terrorists with assault rifles and body armor were foiled, it was because an off-duty traffic cop in Garland, Texas, was carrying a gun—and used it to shoot the two heavily armed Islamists before they could kill anyone. Or that “common sense gun control” would have done nothing to stop Richard Reid (the unsuccessful shoe-bomber); the Tsarnaev brothers in Boston (pressure cookers) or the 9/11 hijackers (box-cutters). Maybe the president should be demanding common sense pressure-cooker control. www.weaselzippers.us/244982-the-liberal-theology-of-gun-control/
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 17, 2015 11:03:12 GMT -5
The enemies of freedom & liberty continue conspiring against the Constitution... Obama meets with Bloomberg to talk guns By Jordan Fabian - 12/16/15 07:51 PM EST President Obama on Wednesday met with former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, an ally of the White House on gun control. The meeting, which was not on the president's public schedule, comes as he is weighing new executive action on guns in response to a series of mass shootings that have marred his presidency. Obama huddled with Bloomberg "as part of the administration's continuing push to address gun violence in America," the White House said in a statement. thehill.com/homenews/administration/263543-obama-meets-with-bloomberg-to-talk-guns
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 19, 2015 6:41:56 GMT -5
EVERYTHING concerning gun control is 'under the radar' with this admin, my only joy in this; is that so many have 'gunned up' during the obamanation, that any frontal attempt at restricting guns is sure to fail. Tis the Season for Gun Owners to be JollyGOA, Friday, 18 December 2015 17:57 “President Obama’s feckless behavior has destroyed people’s confidence that the government can protect them from terrorism. That’s why Americans are buying guns and getting concealed carry permits in record numbers.” -- GOA’s Erich Pratt, The Washington Times, December 16, 2015 You Guys Have Repeatedly Thwarted Obama’s Agenda The past three weeks have been a really good time for Gun Owners of America and the rest of the Second Amendment community. The first blow came from the American people. In the wake of continuing efforts by Barack Obama to scare us into destroying our guns, Black Friday recorded the largest number of gun purchases (as evidenced by background checks) on record: a stunning 185,000 firearms purchases. It is hard to overstate the importance of this. www.gunowners.org/12182015.htm
|
|
|
Post by Michael Downing on Dec 19, 2015 19:32:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Michael Downing on Dec 19, 2015 19:54:27 GMT -5
www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/19/sheriff-joe-arpaio-executive-order-not-im-not-surrendering-guns/Sheriff Joe Arpaio: Executive Order or Not, ‘I’m Not Surrendering the Guns’On December 18, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio referenced President Obama’s pending executive action on gun control and said executive order or not, guns will not be surrendered. Arpaio talked with Breitbart News about a number of gun-related issues and indicated that an ongoing problem is that guns and gun control have become part of the “political situation.” As a result, Democrats react to the criminal misuse of guns by grandstanding to punish law-abiding citizens with gun control. The same thing happens after a terror attack, such as the one that took place in San Bernardino on December 2. Since then, Democrats have pushed to add the no-fly list to background checks, to expand background checks, to pass an “assault weapons” ban, and to institute and fund a national gun buyback. Now, Jen Psaki, White House communications director, says executive action to go around Congress and expand gun control will be coming in “weeks, not months.” Arpaio addressed this pending executive action, saying, “Obama does know we have the Second Amendment, right?” He added, “I’ve said it before. I’m not surrendering the guns. He can give an executive order saying we’ve got to collect the guns, and I’m not going to do it.” Arpaio said that “there’d be a revolution” if a president ever issued such an order.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 20, 2015 6:33:26 GMT -5
Many in LE fully understand what would happen once the line is crossed.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 21, 2015 14:16:09 GMT -5
Here in Ga you are taking a number to get to the firearms sales counters... Next month I am teaching a firearms class to some guys (and their spouses) I know that work with a local city, most of them have just purchased their weapons. Again, I would like to take the time to thank Barack gunsalesmanofthemillennium Obama from the depths of my heart... Thank you, Thank you, Thank you. Local gun retailers seeing record number of people buying guns, trainingMore and more citizens are arming themselves in a response to mass shootings and terrorist attacks.By Amy L. Knapp, Posted Dec. 19, 2015 at 7:15 AM As mass shootings and terrorist attacks increase at home and abroad, the number of people arming themselves is growing. Even more people are seeking training. Self protection and fears of changing gun laws are pushing people to buy guns, according to local gun dealers. www.indeonline.com/article/20151218/NEWS/151219300
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 22, 2015 4:41:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Michael Downing on Dec 23, 2015 17:42:46 GMT -5
Get an open vote so they all have to go on the record as to where they stand on the 2nd amendment... ncrenegade.com/editorial/rand-paul-introduces-bill-to-block-obama-from-executive-action-on-gun-control/Rand Paul Introduces Bill to Block Obama from Executive Action on Gun ControlThe bill states that any “existing or proposed executive action that infringes on the powers and duties of Congress under section 8 of article I of the Constitution of the United States of the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States shall have no force or effect. It is the sense of Congress that any executive action issued by the President before, on, or after the date of enactment of this Act that infringes on the powers and duties of Congress under section 8 of article I of the Constitution of the United States or the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, or that would require the expenditure of Federal funds not specifically appropriated for the purpose of the executive action, is advisory only and has no force or effect unless enacted as law.
|
|
|
Post by Michael Downing on Dec 26, 2015 13:50:12 GMT -5
www.gunsamerica.com/blog/house-democrat-proposes-national-buyback-bill/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=textlink&utm_campaign=20151225_FridayDigest_9House Democrat Proposes National ‘Buyback’ BillI know I don’t have to tell you this, but gun buyback programs are worthless. For starters, it’s not technically a “buyback” because the government never owned the firearm to begin with. A manufacturer made it, shipped it to a dealer, who then sold it to the purchaser. Nowhere in that chain of custody did the government take possession of the firearm. So, “buyback” is a B.S. term. It never belonged to the government! Beyond that, the purpose of a buyback is to, as we so often hear, “take guns off the streets.” The logic behind the buyback is that if we offer criminals money for their firearms they’ll voluntarily disarm and turn their hardware over to law enforcement. It’s such a transparently stupid idea that one wonders how it ever got taken seriously. Proponents of buybacks actually believe that hardened drug dealers and thugs will give up the tools that not only protect their criminal enterprises from rival competitors (gangs, cartels, etc.), but also ensure the safety of themselves, their family and their property — all for a $100 gift certificate or money card. In a way, it’s like asking the lion to give up his claws and teeth for a cheeseburger. On what planet would the lion ever take that deal? So, buybacks do not “take guns off the street.” No criminal shows up to trade in his piece for the Applebee’s gift card. It just doesn’t happen. What ends up happening, though, is that folks from the community turn up and swap out their worthless, junk guns (broken guns, non-operational guns, etc.) for the handout. You can’t blame them either. It’s getting something in exchange for garbage. With that in mind, I want you to consider a recent bill introduced by Democratic congressman Donald M. Payne from New Jersey, called the “The Safer Neighborhoods Gun Buyback Act of 2015.” The premise of the bill is to use $360 million in taxpayer money to allow the U.S. Department of Justice’s Director of Bureau of Justice Assistance (Who knew that agency even existed!) to hand out smart debit cards to state and local governments and gun dealers so that they can be used to purchase unwanted firearms. “We owe it to the communities we have sworn to protect to pursue every opportunity to reduce gun violence in our neighborhoods,” said congressman Payne, Jr. “Although no one piece of legislation will eliminate all gun violence, this bill will get guns off the streets and keep them out of the hands of people who wish to cause harm. If we can get one gun off the street, if we can save one life, then we have to take action.”
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 29, 2015 17:30:43 GMT -5
Obama’s Planned Gun Control Regulations to be Incrementally Imposed After the HolidaysDave Hodges, December 25, 2015 According to my sources, Obama will ultimately implement the following gun control regulations, mostly through a series of Executive Orders. Tax ammunition into oblivion and encourage the prosecution of gun manufacturers and bullet producers for shootings using their products. This is a given and will be rolled out very early in the form of an Executive Order. freedomoutpost.com/2015/12/obamas-planned-gun-control-regulations-to-be-incrementally-imposed-after-the-holidays/
|
|
|
Post by Michael Downing on Dec 29, 2015 18:16:07 GMT -5
If he tries even just a few of these eleven measures by executive order he will be pushing things to a possible flash point.
|
|
|
Post by Michael Downing on Dec 30, 2015 7:57:21 GMT -5
The more liberal states are on the march... ncrenegade.com/editorial/california-law-allowing-seizure-of-guns-without-notice-begins-jan-1/California law allowing seizure of guns without notice begins Jan. 1Gun control legislation going into effect in California next week will allow authorities to seize a person’s weapons for 21 days if a judge determines there is potential for violence. Proposed in the wake of a deadly May 2014 shooting rampage by Elliot Rodger, the bill provides family members with a means of having an emergency “gun violence restraining order” imposed against a loved one if they can convince a judge that this person’s possession of a firearm “poses an immediate and present danger of causing personal injury to himself, herself or another by having in his or her custody or control.” More… www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/dec/29/california-gun-violence-restraining-order-law-goin/~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A little nibble here and there eventually becomes a successfully completed agenda. It worked for the government’s takeover of healthcare and student loans, glorification of homosexuality and the implementation of an autocratic government. The only thing preventing complete domination is: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” You would do well to put this into practice. David DeGerolamo
|
|