Could federal watchdog tamper with Trump wiretap evidence?
Mar 2, 2018 6:16:35 GMT -5
Post by avordvet on Mar 2, 2018 6:16:35 GMT -5
Longtime readers here will remember that I, along with a few other L&P members, was hit with multiple brute force attacks on our computers around the same time as Attkisson. My PC, although heavily protected, was hit twice over the period of a couple of weeks.
The first attack I was able to see, stop, and clean. As a computer tech and MCP I've goofed around computers since the old Commodore 64 days, I've seen computer attacks before but this was different. Even though I tweaked many of the 'security' programs I was running at the time, the final attack was so fast and furious (no pun intended) that I could not stop it even though I was at the PC doing interdiction. They ended up trashing the drive so bad I could not reuse it without advanced programs to reaccess it.
Luckily, even then I had multiple current back-ups of my PC and Data. After that, I started running a very tight and layered security, and multiple remote non cloud back-ups.
Could federal watchdog tamper with Trump wiretap evidence? It may not be a first
By Sharyl Attkisson, opinion contributor — 03/01/18 05:05 PM EST
Everyone hopes the Department of Justice’s inspector general (IG) will fairly investigate surveillance activities conducted on U.S. citizens by the FBI and intel agencies. Just like we hope the IG’s office will reach fair conclusions in its probes of alleged FBI misconduct concerning the Hillary Clinton investigation, leaks to the media and conflicts of interest.
But, for me, there’s reason to be wary.
I turned to the IG’s office in 2013 after independent forensics proved my computers had been infiltrated by remote intruders using software proprietary to a federal intel agency. Instead of fair findings, I got a lot of mischief and stonewalling.
And wait until you hear what I recently learned.
thehill.com/opinion/campaign/376328-could-federal-watchdog-tamper-with-trump-wiretap-evidence-it-may-not-be-a
The first attack I was able to see, stop, and clean. As a computer tech and MCP I've goofed around computers since the old Commodore 64 days, I've seen computer attacks before but this was different. Even though I tweaked many of the 'security' programs I was running at the time, the final attack was so fast and furious (no pun intended) that I could not stop it even though I was at the PC doing interdiction. They ended up trashing the drive so bad I could not reuse it without advanced programs to reaccess it.
Luckily, even then I had multiple current back-ups of my PC and Data. After that, I started running a very tight and layered security, and multiple remote non cloud back-ups.
Could federal watchdog tamper with Trump wiretap evidence? It may not be a first
By Sharyl Attkisson, opinion contributor — 03/01/18 05:05 PM EST
Everyone hopes the Department of Justice’s inspector general (IG) will fairly investigate surveillance activities conducted on U.S. citizens by the FBI and intel agencies. Just like we hope the IG’s office will reach fair conclusions in its probes of alleged FBI misconduct concerning the Hillary Clinton investigation, leaks to the media and conflicts of interest.
But, for me, there’s reason to be wary.
I turned to the IG’s office in 2013 after independent forensics proved my computers had been infiltrated by remote intruders using software proprietary to a federal intel agency. Instead of fair findings, I got a lot of mischief and stonewalling.
And wait until you hear what I recently learned.
thehill.com/opinion/campaign/376328-could-federal-watchdog-tamper-with-trump-wiretap-evidence-it-may-not-be-a