|
Post by avordvet on Jun 20, 2017 4:33:35 GMT -5
I've had a standing bet for over 15 years for anyone to show me a Right that still stands, not one person has been able to do it, why? because as I have stated so many times... you have NO RIGHTS LEFT. The Rights you think you have are illusionary and are forfeit any time the Government says so. So go to your government designated free speech zone and STFU. Federal Court Affirms Ban on Peaceful Protests on Supreme Court Plaza, Refuses to Protect Religious Freedom Rights of War, Death Penalty ProtestersRutherford Institute, June 12, 2017 WASHINGTON, D.C. — A federal court has dismissed a lawsuit brought by The Rutherford Institute on behalf of two peace activists whose ability to engage in expressive activity in the Supreme Court plaza has been restricted by a federal law and U.S. Supreme Court regulation that forbid virtually all speech on the plaza in front of the Supreme Court’s building. In challenging the restrictions as a violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), a federal law protecting the exercise of religious beliefs, Institute attorneys argued that the Supreme Court’s ban on expressive activities on its front porch muzzled those whose religious beliefs compel them to engage in peaceful protests and speak out against war and the death penalty. However, in dismissing the lawsuit, the federal district court ruled that the law and regulation do not substantially burden the protesters’ religious beliefs and practices because the activists could demonstrate elsewhere. The ruling follows a 2015 decision that gave the Supreme Court the green light to restrict expressive First Amendment activities on its plaza. www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/on_the_front_lines/federal_court_affirms_ban_on_peaceful_protests_on_supreme_court_plaza_refus
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Jun 26, 2017 4:52:13 GMT -5
|
|
combatsquid
Junior Member
Why is it that when it's time to do Patriot shit, those who say they are patriots disappear?
Posts: 7
|
Post by combatsquid on Jun 26, 2017 11:28:28 GMT -5
Washington Post
June 14 by Mike DeBonis ~ Lawmakers ought to be able to carry guns, Georgia congressman says Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.), a member of the GOP baseball squad who was on the scene during Wednesday morning’s shooting, said Congress should explore allowing lawmakers to carry weapons to defend themselves.
“If this had happened in Georgia, he wouldn’t have gotten too far,” Loudermilk told reporters Wednesday at the Capitol. “I had a staff member who was in his car maybe 20 yards behind the shooter, who was pinned in his car, who back in Georgia carries a 9-millimeter in his car. . . . He had a clear shot at him. But here, we’re not allowed to carry any weapons here.”
While firearms are strictly regulated on the Capitol grounds and in the rest of the District of Columbia, gun laws in Virginia — where the shooting took place — are significantly less strict. Firearms can be openly carried without a permit, and the state issues permits to carry concealed weapons. Alexandria allows the ownership and carrying of weapons, but discharging a firearm in the city is illegal.
“Most of us are here in D.C., so how do you have the gun here and just transport it to Virginia?” Loudermilk said when Virginia’s laws were pointed out. “I think we need to look at some kind of reciprocity for members here.”
Loudermilk said perhaps a larger group of lawmakers ought to receive security protection, rather than just the top leaders who have a round-the-clock Capitol Police detail.
“We’re not any more special than anybody else, but we are targets,” he said. “This is exactly why there is a lot of fear of even doing town halls at this point. Some of the things this guy is posting on Facebook — we get the same things, and even worse.”
So here is the question that all of you should be asking yourselves. Why is it okay for lawmakers to carry but THE PEOPLE cannot?
Is their SELF PRESERVATION more important than ours? Are their lives more important than ours? WE THE PEOPLE have put up with bullshit like this for far too long. Now is when everyone needs to take action to ensure their own SELF PRESERVATION.
When I was living in Jersey, I found it ridiculously difficult to obtain a permit. Hell you even need to have a permit there if you just want to buy a bb gun. Once you get a permit, you can forget about carrying whether it be open or concealed. The process for obtaining a CCW in Jersey is beyond onerous to say the least. You can pretty much only get a CCW in Jersey if you were prior LEO.
I moved to Georgia almost 3 months ago. After being here for a month, I applied for my permit. Less than a week later I had it in my hands. Carrying did take some getting use to, but I am damn glad that I did it.
With the state of global society today, we can no longer afford to rely on others for our SELF PRESERVATION. I for one will not put my family's SELF PRESERVATION in the hands of a failed democracy.
It has been obvious for quite some time now that our failed government no longer gives a damn about THE PEOPLE. They are only concerned with their own SELF PRESERVATION. What will you do to protect you and yours? Me, I will do whatever is necessary to protect our way of life.
From the Declaration of Independence:
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their SAFETY and HAPPINESS. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new GUARDS FOR THEIR FUTURE SECURITY.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Jun 27, 2017 4:20:57 GMT -5
So here is the question that all of you should be asking yourselves. Why is it okay for lawmakers to carry but THE PEOPLE cannot? Yup, most patriots see it for what it is... Just as with the National Reciprocity Act, when the government starts 'regulating' a Right, it is no longer a Right. ALL that politicians have to do in order correct this 'problem' (for them now) is to REAFFIRM the Second Amendment as it is and should be... an Individual Right that SHALL NOT be infringed. Everyone bitches and moans about Washington D.C.'s corrupt police system that denies citizens a basic Right, but the city of Washinton D.C. takes it's directions straight from Congress, who holds the purse and govenmental strings. District of Columbia home rule From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The United States Congress has ultimate authority over the District. The John A. Wilson Building is home to the mayor and the 13 members of the Council of the District of Columbia.
District of Columbia home rule is the ability of residents of the District of Columbia to govern their local affairs. As the federal capital, the constitution grants the United States Congress exclusive jurisdiction over the District in "all cases whatsoever."
At certain times, and presently since 1973, Congress has allowed certain powers of government to be carried out by locally elected officials. However, Congress maintains the power to overturn local laws and exercises greater oversight of the city than exists for any U.S. state. Furthermore, the District's elected government exists at the pleasure of Congress and could theoretically be revoked at any time.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_home_ruleSo see, the politicians could correct this 'problem' any time they wish.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Jun 28, 2017 5:00:58 GMT -5
Fourth & Fifth Amendment Rights? You silly serf, where do you think you live, in America? New Device Allows Cops To Download All Of Your Smartphone Activity In Seconds
by Tyler Durden, Jun 28, 2017 5:00 AM, Via TheAntiMedia.org, “Any person who operates a motor vehicle in the state shall be deemed to have given consent to field testing of his or her mobile telephone and/or personal electronic device for the purpose of determining the use thereof while operating a motor vehicle, provided that such testing is conducted by or at the direction of a police officer.”That’s language from the text of a bill currently working its way through the New York state legislature. The legislation would allow cops to search through drivers’ cell phones following traffic incidents — even minor fender-benders — to determine if the person was using their phone while behind the wheel. Most states have laws banning the use of mobile devices while driving, though such laws are rarely enforced. This is largely because it’s nearly impossible to catch someone in the act. What person would admit to an officer that they broke the law, the argument goes, particularly when it’s after the fact? After all, cops don’t show up until after the accident occurs. www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-27/new-device-allows-cops-download-all-your-smartphone-activity-seconds
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Jul 5, 2017 5:28:52 GMT -5
Because politician's lives are so much more valuable than yours... No, really – guns for we but not for thee.Posted on June 30, 2017 by Joel Hey, remember two weeks ago when congressional bodies were hitting the ground, and some guy named Loudermilk rushed to a microphone and said congressvermin should pass a law giving them the privilege of going armed anywhere they wanted? And then other, more populist-minded vermin patted the air with their hands and assured us that they’d never, never do such an elitist thing? Heh. Yeah. Good times. Introducing H.R. 2940, The Congressional Self-Defense Act, “To allow Members of Congress to carry a concealed firearm anywhere in the United States, with certain exceptions.” Introduced 6 days after Loudermilk shot his mouth off. Still picking up co-sponsors as of Wednesday. And here’s the text: joelsgulch.com/no-really-guns-for-we-but-not-for-thee/
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Jul 18, 2017 5:30:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Jul 28, 2017 4:15:35 GMT -5
What Police State? Father of 8 Sentenced to Jail for Distributing Jury Nullification PamphletsJuly 26, 2017 | Claire Bernish | The Daily Sheeple A former pastor from Michigan discovered the hard way informing people of their rights under the law as jurors doesn’t sit well with the U.S. government when a judge sentenced him Friday to eight weekends in jail, six months of probation, and fines — all for passing out pamphlets discussing jury nullification. Keith Wood contends passing out the information is well within his constitutional rights to inform potential and selected jurors that, enshrined in the Bill of Rights lies the potent ability to find a defendant not guilty if the law in question is unjust, flawed, or otherwise untenable — even if the accused indeed technically violated. Jury nullification thus arguably acts as citizens’ access to checks and balances: When legislators craft worthless, harmful, inequitable, or just plain ‘bad’ laws, jurors can, in essence, refuse to enforce any punitive measures — refusing to find a person guilty of breaking a law that never should have been inked into the books. www.thedailysheeple.com/what-police-state-father-of-8-sentenced-to-jail-for-distributing-jury-nullification-pamphlets_072017
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Aug 16, 2017 5:30:53 GMT -5
American Citizen Held By Immigration Enforcement For Over 3 Years Without Lawyerby Tyler Durden, Aug 14, 2017 2:43 AM, Submitted by Sovereign Man “I am an American citizen,” Davino Watson pleaded with ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) agents, judges, and jailers. But to no avail; he was held in detention for over 3 years as a deportable illegal immigrant. What did his court appointed lawyer have to say ? Nothing, because he was never assigned one. After all, illegal immigrants are not afforded the same rights of the accused and due process guaranteed to American citizens. The only problem: Davino Watson was in fact an American citizen. Eventually, Watson was released and managed to get a meager court settlement of $82,500. But he would never see the money. Two weeks ago, an appeals court ruled that Watson is not entitled to the compensation. Turns out the statute of limitations expired--while he was still in ICE custody! What this means: www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-13/american-citizen-held-immigration-enforcement-over-3-years-without-lawyer
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Aug 24, 2017 5:05:39 GMT -5
After intimate pat-down, she wonders how much privacy must we give up to fly safely?By Bruce Henderson, August 23, 2017 10:52 AM Jenna MacFarlane was on the way to visit a friend in Baltimore in April when her carry-on bag triggered an alarm at Charlotte’s airport. A Transportation Security Administration screener told MacFarlane she would have to undergo a full-body pat-down by a female officer. Late for her flight and with no option other than to be searched in private, MacFarlane agreed. The pat-down, done over her clothes, explored her breasts, crotch and buttocks. “I did not imagine that she would ask me a few times to spread my legs wider and in fact touch my vagina four times with the side of her hand,” MacFarlane later wrote in a complaint to the TSA. The experience humiliated MacFarlane, 56, a Charlotte graphic designer and part-time teacher who flies several times a year. It also left her with a nagging question that millions of fellow travelers could ask: How much privacy must Americans give up in order to fly safely? Just a month before her search, TSA had launched a new, “more involved” pat-down procedure. TSA defends its screenings. Officers are trained to treat passengers with respect, it says. Pat-downs are done by officers of the same gender as the passenger, with a second officer present, and can be done out of sight of other passengers. “Pat-downs result in the discovery of knives and other dangerous items carried on a passenger’s person on a daily basis,” spokesman Mike England said. “They are a valuable tool in keeping our skies safe.” www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article168840732.html
Since people obviously need a daily reminder... As we have warned since day one, they will only get bolder and more outrageous in their 'Security' requirements.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Aug 25, 2017 4:44:41 GMT -5
Are you silly serfs starting to see the big picture? This is a very clear violation of these mens rights by vindictive government agents. and this is being done to these Citizens by the Trump DOJ, not obama's... Where is the outrage? Unbelievable! Government to Retry Bundy Ranch Defendants a Third Time!Tim Brown — August 24, 2017 These tyrants just can't let it go. They can't make their case to the jury to find these men guilty so they are going to try them a third time and push other defendants' court date back further into the future! After the jury acquitted two defendants in the Bundy Ranch case of all charges against them, they were deadlocked on two others, O. Scott Drexler and Eric Parker, both of Idaho. Still, they were released from prison on Tuesday evening, but discovered on Wednesday that the government, who could not make their case to the jury, want to try them again. "Surprised? No. Disappointed? Yes," said Parker's lawyer, Jess Marchese. "It's clear at this point the prosecution is taking this personally now." Marchese said Acting Nevada U.S. Attorney Steven Myhre twice called Parker a coward during a court hearing Wednesday. Marchese said it was unprofessional and unnecessary. "This is a business," he said. "And there's no need for emotion in a business." It's actually pretty cowardly what Mr. Myhre has been involved in, in attempts to bring in situation and conduct that occurred well after Bundy Ranch against defendants to make his case, as well as being just fine with holding defendants up to five years without worrying about violating their right to a speedy trial. freedomoutpost.com/unbelievable-government-retry-bundy-ranch-defendants-third-time/
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Sept 6, 2017 11:50:08 GMT -5
What Country Is This? Forced Blood Draws, Cavity Searches and ColonoscopiesSeptember 5, 2017 | John W. Whitehead | The Rutherford Institute “The Fourth Amendment was designed to stand between us and arbitrary governmental authority. For all practical purposes, that shield has been shattered, leaving our liberty and personal integrity subject to the whim of every cop on the beat, trooper on the highway and jail official.”—Herman Schwartz, The Nation
Our freedoms—especially the Fourth Amendment—are being choked out by a prevailing view among government bureaucrats that they have the right to search, seize, strip, scan, shoot, spy on, probe, pat down, taser, and arrest any individual at any time and for the slightest provocation. Forced cavity searches, forced colonoscopies, forced blood draws, forced breath-alcohol tests, forced DNA extractions, forced eye scans, forced inclusion in biometric databases: these are just a few ways in which Americans are being forced to accept that we have no control over our bodies, our lives and our property, especially when it comes to interactions with the government. Worse, on a daily basis, Americans are being made to relinquish the most intimate details of who we are—our biological makeup, our genetic blueprints, and our biometrics (facial characteristics and structure, fingerprints, iris scans, etc.)—in order to clear the nearly insurmountable hurdle that increasingly defines life in the United States: we are now guilty until proven innocent. www.thedailysheeple.com/what-country-is-this-forced-blood-draws-cavity-searches-and-colonoscopies_092017
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Sept 13, 2017 4:52:31 GMT -5
Senate Intel slips sentence into bill that could lead to spying on US citizensBy Tim Johnson, September 12, 2017 5:20 PM A Senate panel may be stealthily trying to give federal law enforcement a new tool to go after the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks and its U.S. collaborators. A one-sentence “Sense of Congress” clause was tacked onto the end of a massive 11,700-word bill that was approved by the Senate Intelligence Committee and is likely to come before the full Senate later this month. The clause says that WikiLeaks “resembles a non-state hostile intelligence service” and that the U.S. government “should treat it as such.” www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/national-security/article172919021.html
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Sept 25, 2017 5:39:13 GMT -5
The State owns you and your offspring... act accordingly. School Board Condones Transgender Propaganda in Kindergarten, Denies Parents Opt-Out OptionBy Craig Bannister, September 22, 2017 3:33 PM EDT A California school board has declared that teachers can promote transgenderism to five year-old students – and that the chilrens' parents can’t keep their kids from being subjected to the propaganda. RedState reports that the controversy involving the Rocklin Academy public school system first began when a kindergarten teacher went “outside the curriculum” one day in class: www.cnsnews.com/blog/craig-bannister/school-board-condones-transgender-propaganda-kindergarten-denies-parents-opt
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Sept 27, 2017 4:25:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Oct 25, 2017 4:57:10 GMT -5
Well, how about that?, Republicans taking the side of big business... Republicans, Wall Street score victory in dismantling class-action ruleFN, Published October 24, 2017 Banks, credit card issuers and other financial companies will be able to block customers from banding together to sue over disputes, after the U.S. Senate on Tuesday narrowly killed a rule banning the firms from using "forced arbitration" clauses. Republican Vice President Mike Pence appeared on the Senate floor at 10:11 p.m. EDT to cast the tie-breaking vote as the chamber's president and approve the most significant roll-back of Obama-era financial policy since President Donald Trump took office vowing to loosen the leash on Wall Street. The final count was 51 to 50. www.foxbusiness.com/markets/2017/10/24/republicans-wall-street-score-victory-in-dismantling-class-action-rule.html
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Nov 13, 2017 5:57:45 GMT -5
As I always say, "You have NO Rights left"... None, and it is due to a very simple reason, YOU refuse to stand and fight for them! Oh sure you may clench your fist and mumble something about 'my Rights' when 'your' Rights finally get stomped on right in front of your face. But even then, when push comes to shove, MOST still refuse to fully engage and press home those 'Rights... More Rights Than Free Speech Need ProtectionBy KrisAnne Hall, JD In America, when someone is criticized for kneeling during the national anthem, or when someone speaks a perceived offensive truth, many Americans are quick to aggressively defend our right to freedom of speech as an essential “foundational principle” of America. There’s no denying the importance of free speech. But too many people apparently forget that America has more than one essential foundational principle. - The Right of the People to keep & bear arms is an essential foundational principle.
- The Right of the People to be secure in their property from government defined search and seizure is an essential foundational principle.
- The Rights of the people to due process, a trial by a jury of our peers, and to be secure from cruel punishments are essential foundational principles.
Yet every day, many of the same people so distraught over the loss of free speech, scream for the removal of our essential foundational principle to keep and bear arms. Every day our federal government violates our right to be secure in our property with searches using fake warrants and seizures through civil asset forfeitures. Yet the vast majority of Americans remain silent about these violations of our essential foundational principles. Every day Americans are held in government custody in direct violation of our essential foundational principles. Every day federal judges actively and cruelly deny Americans’ Rights contrary to our essential foundational principles. The frequency and degree to which we neglect all other equally essential foundational principles is baffling. Can you imagine the outrage over a politician fighting to outlaw the word “transgender” because it did not exist at the time of the writing of the Constitution? However, that same argument is used to justify outlawing certain firearms. Many Americans also find similar excuses to justify secret court issued warrants, indefinite detentions, and lawless, arbitrary property seizures. The neglect of any fundamental principle is extremely destructive to the entire foundation of America. We cannot continue to safeguard one fundamental principle while sacrificing all of the others. We must ensure that all rights for all people are protected in America, not just our personal favorites. therevolutionaryact.com/free-speech-protection/
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Nov 21, 2017 5:20:42 GMT -5
You serfs actually thought the Repubublican wins were gonna restore the privacy and protection of the law that the government has stolen from you? Oh they'll pass it again... they always do, a corrupted government will NEVER voluntarily relinquish power over it's citizens. The fight brewing in Congress over how to reauthorize a key surveillance toolBy Rebecca Shabad CBS News November 20, 2017, 6:00 AM, Last Updated Nov 20, 2017 10:08 AM EST Nearly a decade ago, FBI agents arrested a 24-year-old legal permanent resident from Afghanistan in the U.S. who was charged with conspiracy to bomb the New York City subway system. A tool approved by Congress in 2008 helped federal officials catch this man, Najibullah Zazi, and prevent him from carrying out his plot. That tool is set to expire Dec. 31, and a debate has been brewing among lawmakers about where a reauthorization should fit on the spectrum of balancing broad surveillance powers and protecting individuals' privacy. www.cbsnews.com/news/the-fight-brewing-in-congress-over-how-to-reauthorize-a-key-surveillance-tool/
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Dec 1, 2017 5:49:58 GMT -5
When will you lemmings learn, you belong to the 'State' 24 hrs a day and they will ensure that you learn that early on... Judge issues ruling on Albany High online posting lawsuitsBy Damin Esper, PUBLISHED: November 30, 2017 at 12:49 pm | UPDATED: November 30, 2017 at 3:06 pm An appeal is possible. Normally, a party to a lawsuit has 30 days to file an appeal after a final ruling. The plaintiffs argued that however vile the posts were, they were protected as free speech and so was “liking” and commenting on them. Also, because the account was allegedly created off school property, the actions did not constitute “school speech,” which covers when a school can restrict free speech rights –– generally speech that disrupts classwork, involves “substantial disorder,” or invades the rights of others, under Tinker v. Des Moines Independent County School District (1969). “Without question, the original posts and verbal comments are within the scope of the First Amendment,” Donato wrote. However, Donato wrote that the posts, likes and comments satisfied several legal tests to qualify as school speech “potentially subject to greater regulation by school authorities.” The fact that the posts targeted Albany High students and included pictures that had been taken on campus weighed heavily in the ruling. Donato wrote that the targeted students “have the right to be free of online posts that denigrate their race, ethnicity or physical appearance, or threaten violence.” www.eastbaytimes.com/2017/11/30/judge-issues-ruling-on-albany-high-online-posting-lawsuits/
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Jan 8, 2018 5:38:20 GMT -5
The Government (Federal, State, and Local) owns ALL the property within U.S. territorial bounderies, you just temporarily rent it from them with your property and income taxes. So it's only fair that they get to tell you what structures you can place on their property... Told their treehouse must go, owners appeal to Supreme CourtBy jessica gresko, Jan 6, 2018, 8:01 PM ET Lynn Tran and Richard Hazen built a Florida beachfront treehouse that would be the envy of any child. It's got two levels, hammocks and windows looking out on the Gulf of Mexico. But the hangout has cost the couple a handsome sum: about $30,000 to construct and probably five times that in legal fees as they've fought local authorities over it, Tran said. Now, they're at their last stop, the Supreme Court. Unless the high court intervenes, the treehouse must be torn down. The justices had their first opportunity to consider taking the case at a closed-door conference Friday, and a decision on whether they will weigh in could come as early as Monday. The couple's lawyer, David Levin, acknowledges the case is unlikely to be accepted by the justices, who only hear argument in about 80 of the thousands of cases they're asked to take each year. But he argues that his clients' rights were violated when a Florida court "rubber stamped" a ruling proposed by the city of Holmes Beach without any evidence of independent consideration. abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/told-treehouse-owners-appeal-supreme-court-52177692
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Oct 24, 2018 5:05:10 GMT -5
As I keep reminding: YOU don't own property property in the United States anymore, the government owns it all... Bullshit you say? Then stop paying Government 'rent', also known as 'property taxes', and you will really see who owns YOUR property. Brothers face $450,000 in penalties for removing trees from their propertyBy Dana Afana, Updated Oct 22; Posted Oct 22 CANTON TWP., MI -- Brothers Gary and Matt Percy could face nearly half a million dollars in penalties for removing more than 1,400 trees from their property without permission from Canton Township. The two own a 16-acre property off of Yost Road, east of Belleville Road in Canton Township with the intention of creating a Christmas tree farm on the plot, according to their attorney, Michael J. Pattwell. The land was filled with "invasive plants like phragmites, buckthorn and autumn olive," he said. But the township requires land owners to gain permission and promise new tree plantings before cutting down existing forestry, especially for landmark or historic trees. www.mlive.com/news/detroit/index.ssf/2018/10/brothers_could_pay_nearly_half.html
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Nov 5, 2019 5:41:31 GMT -5
When will you silly serfs learn, they don't destroy or sell your property... they destroy and sell their property so they don't owe you a thing... Oh you think you OWN your house and land? well then, stop paying your government rent (also known as property taxes), and you will see how much you actually OWN.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Jan 21, 2020 5:26:50 GMT -5
When will you silly serfs learn, any property or funds that you happen to have, belongs to the all powerful state in the end...
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Feb 3, 2020 15:57:08 GMT -5
Silly Serfs, of course the government owns the sky, all is as it should be...
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Mar 23, 2020 14:43:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on May 7, 2020 5:16:12 GMT -5
The Government WILL take over any Rights you do not wish to violently defend... Fight like YOUR Freedom and Liberty depend on it...
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Jan 7, 2021 5:30:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Mar 10, 2021 18:14:29 GMT -5
Silly serfs, Civil Rights are only for free people... which isn't you.
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Jun 30, 2021 13:56:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by avordvet on Jul 31, 2021 5:08:00 GMT -5
You silly serfs, Uncle Sugar will tell you what you need...
|
|